1.Because of the son's dangerous way of driving the accident happened, because he's speeding up in a danger road.
2.Because police had a reason to stop him because he's driving in a dangerous way which looks like a drunk man and this will lead to an accident.
3.Because it was the mothers mistake was to give her son a car while he's a new driver he should practice more and to be watched.
therefore we recommend the police is not guilty but the mother is wrong when she let him go out and drive when he just got his license while he should practice more to be able to drive on the roads and not to make any dangerous to the public. and I hope the judge gives her a free lessons on how to rise a teenager in case she had another boy or if she is ignoring her children then I recommend him to give a special care for them and to keep them away from problems.
very nice conclusion
ReplyDeletegood conclusion because you found who is the guilty side.
DeleteYousef Al Hammadi
Why??
DeleteWho???
Deletegood premises and great conclusion
ReplyDeleteAmazing premises right to the point
ReplyDeleteThanks everyone
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your opinion but I think the main reason for the accident is the son's reckless way of driving which might have been impacted by his young age.
ReplyDeleteyea but because of his age he need someone to guide him, which comes to the mother, she ignored him which lead to the accident. thanks Abdulrhman
Deletegood conclusion , but you do not think that also the manufacturer is guilty. the same vehicle had same accident six times...???????
ReplyDeleteIf there is a manufacture problem it will be a big deal everywhere and the news will cover it and the websites too, but it's just a coincidence in my opinion. because the manufacture problem is not official.
Delete